PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) and Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HBNK.TO
Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
1.67%43.71%24.77%8.99%
HMAX.TO
Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
-3.41%27.20%20.65%4.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBNK.TO achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than HMAX.TO's -3.41% return.


HBNK.TO

1D
2.25%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
1.67%
6M
14.60%
1Y
52.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HMAX.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
5.24%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBNK.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBNK.TO
HBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

HMAX.TO
HMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) and Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBNK.TOHMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.89

2.10

+1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.95

2.76

+2.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.43

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.21

2.97

+3.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.46

12.60

+11.87

HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is higher than the HMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBNK.TO and HMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBNK.TOHMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89

2.10

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.31

1.19

+1.13

Correlation

The correlation between HBNK.TO and HMAX.TO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than HMAX.TO's 12.91% yield.


TTM202520242023
HBNK.TO
Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.97%3.24%4.15%2.45%
HMAX.TO
Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
12.91%12.29%14.08%15.47%

Drawdowns

HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, roughly equal to the maximum HMAX.TO drawdown of -15.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBNK.TO and HMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HBNK.TOHMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.78%

-15.34%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-9.02%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-6.53%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-3.07%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.13%

+0.02%

Volatility

HBNK.TO vs. HMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) at 4.69%. This indicates that HBNK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HBNK.TOHMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

4.69%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

7.76%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

12.33%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.43%

11.37%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

11.37%

+1.06%