SIXP vs. UXJA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SIXP (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF) and UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SIXP returned 17.68% vs 29.61% for UXJA. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SIXP charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJA.

Performance

SIXP vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXP achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than UXJA's 11.66% return.

SIXP

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 6.59%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 17.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UXJA

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 11.66%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXP vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIXP AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF	6.59%	11.64%
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	11.66%	13.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXP and UXJA is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.96

The correlation between SIXP and UXJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIXP vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXP

SIXP Risk / Return Rank: 88
SIXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SIXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SIXP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SIXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SIXP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

UXJA

UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 66
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXP vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXP	UXJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	2.20	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.17	2.98	+1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.38	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	3.03	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.92	13.05	+8.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXP vs. UXJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXP Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the UXJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXP and UXJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXP	UXJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83	2.20	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	1.04	+0.50

Drawdowns

SIXP vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXP drawdown since its inception was -11.28%, smaller than the maximum UXJA drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXP and UXJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXP	UXJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.28%	-20.01%	+8.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.48%	-9.83%	+5.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.67%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-2.97%	+2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	2.27%	-1.46%

Volatility

SIXP vs. UXJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) is 0.80%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that SIXP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXP	UXJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.80%	3.40%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.01%	10.05%	-5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.28%	13.54%	-7.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.00%	18.59%	-9.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.00%	18.59%	-9.59%

SIXP vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXP has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJA's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXP vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXP nor UXJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXP and UXJA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SIXP and UXJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SIXP or UXJA?

UXJA has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to SIXP (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXP dropped -11.28% vs UXJA's -20.01%.

Which ETF is better, SIXP or UXJA?

On 1-year performance, UXJA leads with 29.61% vs 17.68% for SIXP. On fees, SIXP is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SIXP has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXP or UXJA?

Over the 1-year period, UXJA has performed better with a 29.61% return vs 17.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXP or UXJA?

SIXP is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXP or UXJA?

SIXP and UXJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SIXP and UXJA?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXP and 0.85% for UXJA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.