PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXP vs. JANW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXP vs. JANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXP achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly higher than JANW's 4.39% return.


SIXP

1D
-0.00%
1M
1.89%
YTD
6.70%
6M
7.66%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JANW

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.65%
YTD
4.39%
6M
5.14%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXP vs. JANW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXP and JANW is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2024

0.90

The correlation between SIXP and JANW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXP vs. JANW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXP
JANW

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SIXP
36.2%
JANW
36.2%

Financial Services

SIXP
11.9%
JANW
11.9%

Communication Services

SIXP
10.9%
JANW
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXP
10.1%
JANW
10.1%

Healthcare

SIXP
8.4%
JANW
8.4%

Industrials

SIXP
8.1%
JANW
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SIXP
4.9%
JANW
4.9%

Energy

SIXP
3.5%
JANW
3.5%

Utilities

SIXP
2.3%
JANW
2.3%

Real Estate

SIXP
1.9%
JANW
1.9%

Basic Materials

SIXP
1.8%
JANW
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXP vs. JANW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXP
SIXP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SIXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

JANW
JANW Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXP vs. JANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXPJANWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.93

2.80

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.30

4.22

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.61

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

3.52

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.90

19.45

+3.45

SIXP vs. JANW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXP Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the JANW Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXP and JANW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXPJANWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

2.80

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

1.28

+0.27

Drawdowns

SIXP vs. JANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXP drawdown since its inception was -11.28%, which is greater than JANW's maximum drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXP and JANW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXPJANWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.28%

-9.69%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-3.65%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-1.23%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.66%

+0.15%

Volatility

SIXP vs. JANW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF (SIXP) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) at 0.78%. This indicates that SIXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXPJANWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.78%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.00%

3.66%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.27%

4.59%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.00%

6.77%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.00%

6.67%

+2.33%

SIXP vs. JANW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXP and JANW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

SIXP vs. JANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXP nor JANW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXP and JANW have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXP has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to JANW (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXP dropped -11.28% vs JANW's -9.69%.

On 1-year performance, SIXP leads with 18.30% vs 12.80% for JANW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SIXP has performed better with a 18.30% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIXP and JANW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

SIXP and JANW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SIXP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while JANW is Options Trading.

SIXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXP and JANW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer