SIXO vs. HELO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SIXO (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Options Trading funds. SIXO is passively managed, while HELO is actively managed. Over the past year, SIXO returned 9.40% vs 10.94% for HELO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXO charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.

Performance

SIXO vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXO achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 2.26% return.

SIXO

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 2.88%
• 6M: 3.50%
• 1Y: 9.40%
• 3Y*: 9.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HELO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.72%
• 1Y: 10.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXO vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SIXO AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF	2.88%	7.19%	12.22%	6.01%
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.26%	7.82%	18.05%	6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXO and HELO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.86

The correlation between SIXO and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXO vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXO	HELO
Technology	36.2%	39.8%
Financial Services	11.9%	10.0%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	11.6%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.2%
Industrials	8.1%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.5%
Energy	3.5%	3.3%
Utilities	2.3%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.5%

Return for Risk

SIXO vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXO

SIXO Risk / Return Rank: 54
SIXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SIXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SIXO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SIXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SIXO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

HELO

HELO Risk / Return Rank: 51
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXO vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXO	HELO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.77	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.50	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.36	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	1.91	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.68	8.44	+0.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXO vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXO and HELO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXO	HELO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	1.77	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.63	-0.77

Drawdowns

SIXO vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, which is greater than HELO's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and HELO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXO	HELO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.04%	-10.89%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.13%	-5.76%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.32%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-1.18%	-0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.30%	-0.21%

Volatility

SIXO vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) is 0.64%, while JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that SIXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXO	HELO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	0.70%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.06%	4.99%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.20%	6.20%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.07%	7.95%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.07%	7.95%	+1.12%

SIXO vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXO vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

SIXO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.62%	0.67%	0.60%	0.19%
SIXO AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXO and HELO in my portfolio?

SIXO and HELO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXO or HELO?

HELO has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to SIXO (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXO dropped -12.04% vs HELO's -10.89%.

Which ETF is better, SIXO or HELO?

On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 10.94% vs 9.40% for SIXO. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXO or HELO?

Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXO or HELO?

HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXO or HELO?

HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for SIXO.

What is the main difference between SIXO and HELO?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXO and 0.50% for HELO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.