SIXO vs. APRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SIXO (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF) and APRW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. SIXO is passively managed, while APRW is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIXO returned 9.69%/yr vs 10.31%/yr for APRW. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

SIXO vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXO achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than APRW's 6.27% return.

SIXO

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 6M: 3.38%
• 1Y: 9.31%
• 3Y*: 9.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRW

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 6.27%
• 6M: 7.02%
• 1Y: 12.59%
• 3Y*: 10.31%
• 5Y*: 7.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXO vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SIXO AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF	2.76%	7.19%	12.22%	17.44%	-5.66%	3.65%
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF	6.27%	6.18%	11.25%	12.38%	-2.90%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXO and APRW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021	0.86

The correlation between SIXO and APRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXO vs. APRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXO	APRW
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SIXO vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXO

SIXO Risk / Return Rank: 53
SIXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SIXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SIXO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SIXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SIXO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

APRW

APRW Risk / Return Rank: 98
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXO vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXO	APRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	4.83	-3.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	8.87	-6.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	2.23	-0.85
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	16.82	-14.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.59	86.04	-77.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXO vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXO and APRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXO	APRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	4.83	-3.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	1.15	-0.29

Drawdowns

SIXO vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, which is greater than APRW's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and APRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXO	APRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.04%	-9.61%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.13%	-0.75%	-3.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.95%	-9.61%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.09%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-1.12%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	0.15%	+0.94%

Volatility

SIXO vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) at 0.60%. This indicates that SIXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXO	APRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	0.60%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.06%	1.84%	+2.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.21%	2.62%	+2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.08%	6.72%	+2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.08%	6.41%	+2.67%

SIXO vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXO and APRW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

SIXO vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXO nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.67%
SIXO AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXO and APRW in my portfolio?

SIXO and APRW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXO or APRW?

SIXO has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to APRW (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXO dropped -12.04% vs APRW's -9.61%.

Which ETF is better, SIXO or APRW?

On 3-year performance, APRW leads with 10.31% vs 9.69% for SIXO. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXO or APRW?

Over the 3-year period, APRW has performed better with a 10.31% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXO or APRW?

SIXO and APRW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXO or APRW?

SIXO and APRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.