SIXO vs. APRP
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP).
SIXO and APRP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIXO is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Sep 30, 2021. APRP is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Mar 28, 2024.
Performance
SIXO vs. APRP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIXO vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SIXO AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF | -2.74% | 7.19% | 9.62% |
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April | 1.89% | 7.80% | 10.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXO achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than APRP's 1.89% return.
SIXO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 6.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRP
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 13.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIXO vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIXO vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank
SIXO
APRP
SIXO vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXO | APRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 1.39 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 2.10 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.45 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.75 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 11.80 | -6.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXO | APRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.39 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.04 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXO and APRP is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SIXO vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXO nor APRP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SIXO vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, smaller than the maximum APRP drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and APRP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXO | APRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.04% | -13.66% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -8.24% | +0.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | 0.00% | -4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -1.33% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | 1.22% | +0.20% |
Volatility
SIXO vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) is 1.81%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that SIXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIXO | APRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 1.98% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | 2.97% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.83% | 9.96% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.21% | 9.76% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.21% | 9.76% | -0.55% |