SIXJ vs. SEPT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SIXJ (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF) and SEPT (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXJ is a Options Trading fund tracking the S&P 500, while SEPT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz. SIXJ is passively managed, while SEPT is actively managed. Over the past year, SIXJ returned 16.93% vs 19.52% for SEPT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

SIXJ vs. SEPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXJ achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than SEPT's 6.29% return.

SIXJ

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 6.85%
• 1Y: 16.93%
• 3Y*: 13.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEPT

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 6.29%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 19.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXJ vs. SEPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF	5.77%	12.81%	14.48%	5.37%
SEPT AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF	6.29%	14.95%	16.43%	4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXJ and SEPT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2023	0.87

The correlation between SIXJ and SEPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXJ vs. SEPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXJ	SEPT
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SIXJ vs. SEPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXJ

SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 87
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

SEPT

SEPT Risk / Return Rank: 82
SEPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SEPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SEPT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SEPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SEPT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXJ vs. SEPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXJ	SEPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	2.62	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	3.78	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.52	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	3.64	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.41	18.48	+1.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXJ vs. SEPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the SEPT Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXJ and SEPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXJ	SEPT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	2.62	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	1.60	-0.73

Drawdowns

SIXJ vs. SEPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, which is greater than SEPT's maximum drawdown of -12.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and SEPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXJ	SEPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.07%	-12.83%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.53%	-5.39%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	-0.14%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-1.09%	-1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	1.06%	-0.23%

Volatility

SIXJ vs. SEPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) is 0.75%, while AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that SIXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXJ	SEPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	1.12%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.60%	5.61%	-1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.84%	7.49%	-1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.02%	9.87%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.02%	9.87%	+0.15%

SIXJ vs. SEPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXJ and SEPT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

SIXJ vs. SEPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXJ nor SEPT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXJ and SEPT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SIXJ and SEPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SIXJ or SEPT?

SEPT has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to SIXJ (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXJ dropped -14.07% vs SEPT's -12.83%.

Which ETF is better, SIXJ or SEPT?

On 1-year performance, SEPT leads with 19.52% vs 16.93% for SIXJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, SIXJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXJ or SEPT?

Over the 1-year period, SEPT has performed better with a 19.52% return vs 16.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXJ or SEPT?

SIXJ and SEPT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXJ or SEPT?

SIXJ and SEPT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SIXJ and SEPT?

SIXJ is categorized as Options Trading, while SEPT is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.