SIXJ vs. OCTW
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW).
SIXJ and OCTW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIXJ is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 31, 2021. OCTW is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. It was launched on Sep 30, 2020. Both SIXJ and OCTW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SIXJ vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIXJ vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF | -1.87% | 12.81% | 14.48% | 18.07% | -10.71% |
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF | -1.36% | 9.68% | 8.67% | 17.57% | 0.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXJ achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than OCTW's -1.36% return.
SIXJ
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTW
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIXJ vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SIXJ and OCTW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Return for Risk
SIXJ vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank
SIXJ
OCTW
SIXJ vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXJ | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.76 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.68 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 9.02 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXJ | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.33 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXJ and OCTW is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SIXJ vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXJ nor OCTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SIXJ vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, which is greater than OCTW's maximum drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and OCTW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXJ | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -8.38% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | -5.86% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -2.33% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -0.84% | -2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 1.09% | +0.20% |
Volatility
SIXJ vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) at 2.42%. This indicates that SIXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIXJ | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 2.42% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.58% | 4.07% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 8.03% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 6.25% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 6.19% | +3.98% |