SIXJ vs. JULW
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW).
SIXJ and JULW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIXJ is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 31, 2021. JULW is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020.
Performance
SIXJ vs. JULW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIXJ vs. JULW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF | -1.44% | 12.81% | 14.48% | 18.07% | -10.71% |
JULW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF | -0.44% | 11.57% | 12.39% | 16.06% | -1.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXJ achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than JULW's -0.44% return.
SIXJ
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -1.44%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 12.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULW
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 12.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIXJ vs. JULW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SIXJ and JULW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Return for Risk
SIXJ vs. JULW — Risk / Return Rank
SIXJ
JULW
SIXJ vs. JULW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXJ | JULW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 2.26 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.01 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 11.75 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXJ | JULW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.30 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXJ and JULW is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SIXJ vs. JULW - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXJ nor JULW has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JULW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.04% |
Drawdowns
SIXJ vs. JULW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, which is greater than JULW's maximum drawdown of -9.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and JULW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXJ | JULW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -9.49% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | -6.47% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -1.37% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -0.94% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 1.11% | +0.19% |
Volatility
SIXJ vs. JULW - Volatility Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW) at 2.41%. This indicates that SIXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JULW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIXJ | JULW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 2.41% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.60% | 3.45% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 8.67% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.16% | 6.86% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.16% | 6.61% | +3.55% |