SIXJ vs. JULQ
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ).
SIXJ and JULQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIXJ is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 31, 2021. JULQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 30, 2023.
Performance
SIXJ vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIXJ vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF | -2.19% |
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
SIXJ
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -1.44%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 12.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIXJ vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXJ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIXJ vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank
SIXJ
JULQ
SIXJ vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXJ | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXJ | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | — | — |
Dividends
SIXJ vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXJ nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SIXJ vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and JULQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXJ | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | 0.00% | -14.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | 0.00% | -2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | 0.00% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | — | — |
Volatility
SIXJ vs. JULQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIXJ | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 0.00% | +10.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.16% | 0.00% | +10.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.16% | 0.00% | +10.16% |