PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXJ vs. JULQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIXJ vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIXJ vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


SIXJ

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
1.24%
1Y
12.55%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
10Y*

JULQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIXJ vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXJ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SIXJ vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXJ
SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

JULQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXJ vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXJJULQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.84

SIXJ vs. JULQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXJJULQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

Dividends

SIXJ vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXJ nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SIXJ vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and JULQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXJJULQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.07%

0.00%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

0.00%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

0.00%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

Volatility

SIXJ vs. JULQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SIXJJULQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

0.00%

+10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.16%

0.00%

+10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.16%

0.00%

+10.16%