SIXJ vs. DBO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SIXJ (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXJ is a Options Trading fund tracking the S&P 500, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIXJ returned 13.23%/yr vs 14.86%/yr for DBO. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SIXJ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

SIXJ vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXJ achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.

SIXJ

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: 6.12%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 1Y: 13.89%
• 3Y*: 13.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.65%

DBO

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 24.59%
• 6M: 53.46%
• YTD: 76.48%
• 1Y: 60.30%
• 3Y*: 14.86%
• 5Y*: 13.46%
• 10Y*: 12.59%
• ALL TIME*: 0.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	$11.01M	$10.23M	$13.95M
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF	$764.48K	$1.20M	$745.05K

SIXJ vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF	6.88%	12.81%	14.48%	18.07%	-10.33%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	76.48%	-11.71%	7.85%	-4.44%	13.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXJ and DBO is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.24
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022	0.03

The correlation between SIXJ and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SIXJ vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXJ

SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 88
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 92

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 58
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXJ vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXJ	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.45	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	2.05	+1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.01	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.40	6.09	+9.31

SIXJ vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXJ and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXJ vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXJ	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.07%	-90.18%	+76.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.53%	-27.73%	+23.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.89%	-28.20%	+17.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-53.56%	+53.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-62.20%	+59.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	9.96%	-9.11%

Volatility

SIXJ vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) is 1.96%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that SIXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXJ	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.96%	17.75%	-15.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.00%	33.77%	-28.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.94%	38.53%	-32.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.91%	33.35%	-23.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.91%	32.20%	-22.29%

SIXJ vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXJ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXJ vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

SIXJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.99%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXJ and DBO in my portfolio?

SIXJ and DBO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXJ or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to SIXJ (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXJ dropped -14.07% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, SIXJ or DBO?

On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 14.86% vs 13.23% for SIXJ. On fees, SIXJ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SIXJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXJ or DBO?

Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 13.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXJ or DBO?

SIXJ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXJ or DBO?

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for SIXJ.

What is the main difference between SIXJ and DBO?

SIXJ is categorized as Options Trading, while DBO is Oil & Gas. SIXJ tracks S&P 500, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXJ and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.