SIXJ vs. AUGT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SIXJ (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF) and AUGT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. SIXJ is passively managed, while AUGT is actively managed. Over the past year, SIXJ returned 16.50% vs 16.72% for AUGT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

SIXJ vs. AUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SIXJ having a 5.79% return and AUGT slightly higher at 5.89%.

SIXJ

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 16.50%
• 3Y*: 13.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AUGT

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 5.89%
• 6M: 5.39%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXJ vs. AUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF	5.79%	12.81%	14.48%	5.14%
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF	5.89%	14.64%	19.69%	3.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXJ and AUGT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023	0.87

The correlation between SIXJ and AUGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIXJ vs. AUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXJ

SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AUGT

AUGT Risk / Return Rank: 82
AUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
AUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXJ vs. AUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXJ	AUGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	2.29	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.18	3.26	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.45	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	3.13	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.87	16.20	+3.67

SIXJ vs. AUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the AUGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXJ and AUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXJ vs. AUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, which is greater than AUGT's maximum drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and AUGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXJ	AUGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.07%	-13.12%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.53%	-5.36%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.64%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-1.22%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	1.03%	-0.20%

Volatility

SIXJ vs. AUGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) is 1.48%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that SIXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXJ	AUGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	1.67%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.78%	5.59%	-0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.82%	7.40%	-1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.98%	10.13%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.98%	10.13%	-0.15%

SIXJ vs. AUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXJ and AUGT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

SIXJ vs. AUGT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXJ nor AUGT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXJ and AUGT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SIXJ and AUGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SIXJ or AUGT?

AUGT has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to SIXJ (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXJ dropped -14.07% vs AUGT's -13.12%.

Which ETF is better, SIXJ or AUGT?

On 1-year performance, AUGT leads with 16.72% vs 16.50% for SIXJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, SIXJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXJ or AUGT?

Over the 1-year period, AUGT has performed better with a 16.72% return vs 16.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXJ or AUGT?

SIXJ and AUGT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXJ or AUGT?

SIXJ and AUGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.