PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXF vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXF vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF (SIXF) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXF achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly lower than AMZY's 10.52% return.


SIXF

1D
0.48%
1M
1.44%
6M
6.90%
YTD
8.31%
1Y
15.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.75%

AMZY

1D
12.51%
1M
10.78%
6M
8.94%
YTD
10.52%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.19M$2.74M$4.75M
$106.69K$66.84K$166.52K

SIXF vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXF and AMZY is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.60

The correlation between SIXF and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXF vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXF
SIXF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SIXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXF vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF (SIXF) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXFAMZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.09

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

0.48

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.65

1.06

+14.59

SIXF vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXF and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXF vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXF drawdown since its inception was -11.25%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXF and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXFAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.25%

-23.70%

+12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.82%

-19.61%

+14.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.31%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-5.58%

+4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

8.94%

-8.01%

Volatility

SIXF vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF (SIXF) is 2.34%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 13.48%. This indicates that SIXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXFAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

13.48%

-11.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.41%

21.27%

-15.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.47%

27.98%

-21.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.66%

26.08%

-17.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.66%

26.08%

-17.42%

SIXF vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXF has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXF vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

SIXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.74%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
46.74%52.59%47.91%9.90%
SIXF
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXF and AMZY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to SIXF (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXF dropped -11.25% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 17.47% vs 15.47% for SIXF. On fees, SIXF is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SIXF has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 17.47% return vs 15.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIXF is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 46.74%, compared with 0.00% for SIXF.

SIXF is categorized as Options Trading, while AMZY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXF and 1.09% for AMZY.

SIXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXF and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer