SIXA vs. STRN
SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) and STRN (SMART Trend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while STRN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by SmartWay. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIXA charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for STRN.
Performance
SIXA vs. STRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly lower than STRN's 19.31% return.
SIXA
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 12.02%
- YTD
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
STRN
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXA vs. STRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 14.76% | 1.57% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 19.31% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXA and STRN is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXA vs. STRN — Risk / Return Rank
SIXA
STRN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIXA vs. STRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIXA | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIXA vs. STRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than STRN's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and STRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXA | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -15.43% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.89% | +8.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -3.00% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | — | — |
Volatility
SIXA vs. STRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXA | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 26.85% | -17.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 26.85% | -14.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 26.85% | -13.57% |
SIXA vs. STRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than STRN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXA vs. STRN - Dividend Comparison
SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than STRN's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.00% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXA and STRN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STRN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STRN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.15% for STRN.
SIXA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while STRN is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and SmartWay. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.59% for STRN.
Find the right allocation for SIXA and STRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer