SIXA vs. SPLV
SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. SIXA is actively managed, while SPLV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXA returned 12.50%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for SPLV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXA charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLV.
Performance
SIXA vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 1.32% return.
SIXA
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -0.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
SIXA vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 11.89% | 15.52% | 22.70% | 11.98% | -5.72% | 23.87% | 18.45% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1.32% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | -4.88% | 24.13% | 16.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXA and SPLV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SIXA and SPLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SIXA vs. SPLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXA
SPLV
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXA
SPLV
Technology
SIXA
SPLV
Communication Services
SIXA
SPLV
Healthcare
SIXA
SPLV
Financial Services
SIXA
SPLV
Industrials
SIXA
SPLV
Consumer Cyclical
SIXA
SPLV
Utilities
SIXA
SPLV
Energy
SIXA
SPLV
Real Estate
SIXA
SPLV
Basic Materials
SIXA
-
SPLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXA vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank
SIXA
SPLV
SIXA vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXA | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.01 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | -0.00 | +3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.75 | -0.01 | +12.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXA | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | -0.00 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.43 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.68 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
SIXA vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and SPLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXA | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -36.26% | +17.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | -7.41% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | -9.64% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -17.26% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -6.91% | +6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -3.55% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 3.05% | -1.58% |
Volatility
SIXA vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is 2.56%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that SIXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXA | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 2.97% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.76% | 6.78% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 9.78% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 12.45% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 15.36% | -2.00% |
SIXA vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXA vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than SPLV's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.01% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.22% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXA and SPLV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to SIXA (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs SPLV's -36.26%.
On 5-year performance, SIXA leads with 12.50% vs 5.33% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 5.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 2.01% for SIXA.
SIXA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPLV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.25% for SPLV.
SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXA and SPLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer