SIXA vs. SCHK
SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SIXA is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXA returned 12.93%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXA charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
SIXA vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 8.54% return.
SIXA
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXA vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 13.24% | 15.52% | 22.70% | 11.98% | -5.72% | 23.87% | 19.04% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 8.54% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 32.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXA and SCHK is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SIXA and SCHK has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SIXA vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXA
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXA
SCHK
Technology
SIXA
SCHK
Healthcare
SIXA
SCHK
Communication Services
SIXA
SCHK
Financial Services
SIXA
SCHK
Industrials
SIXA
SCHK
Utilities
SIXA
SCHK
Energy
SIXA
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
SIXA
SCHK
Real Estate
SIXA
SCHK
Basic Materials
SIXA
-
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXA vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
SIXA
SCHK
SIXA vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIXA | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 2.65 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.65 | 11.81 | +1.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIXA vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXA | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -34.80% | +16.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | -8.97% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | -19.21% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -25.44% | +7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -2.98% | +2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -5.16% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 2.01% | -0.54% |
Volatility
SIXA vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is 2.59%, while Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that SIXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXA | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 4.96% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 10.10% | -3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 12.84% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.79% | 17.34% | -4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 19.12% | -5.80% |
SIXA vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXA vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than SCHK's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 1.99% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXA and SCHK have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHK has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to SIXA (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 5-year performance, SIXA leads with 12.93% vs 12.31% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.03% for SCHK.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.03% for SCHK.
SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXA and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer