SIXA vs. DAX
SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) and DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index. SIXA is actively managed, while DAX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXA returned 12.50%/yr vs 7.71%/yr for DAX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXA charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DAX.
Performance
SIXA vs. DAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's -0.66% return.
SIXA
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
DAX
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
SIXA vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 11.89% | 15.52% | 22.70% | 11.98% | -5.72% | 23.87% | 18.45% |
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | -0.66% | 39.00% | 10.55% | 23.62% | -18.47% | 7.73% | 41.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXA and DAX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between SIXA and DAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIXA vs. DAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXA
DAX
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXA
DAX
Technology
SIXA
DAX
Communication Services
SIXA
DAX
Healthcare
SIXA
DAX
Financial Services
SIXA
DAX
Industrials
SIXA
DAX
Consumer Cyclical
SIXA
DAX
Utilities
SIXA
DAX
Energy
SIXA
DAX
-
Real Estate
SIXA
DAX
Basic Materials
SIXA
-
DAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXA vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank
SIXA
DAX
SIXA vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXA | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.05 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 0.26 | +3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.75 | 0.83 | +11.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXA | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 0.22 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.38 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.35 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
SIXA vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum DAX drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and DAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXA | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -45.58% | +27.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | -14.82% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | -16.03% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -39.96% | +21.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -4.63% | +3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -10.51% | +7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 4.68% | -3.21% |
Volatility
SIXA vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is 2.56%, while Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that SIXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXA | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 6.09% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.76% | 14.37% | -7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 17.66% | -8.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 20.38% | -7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 21.28% | -7.92% |
SIXA vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXA vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison
SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than DAX's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | 1.48% | 1.47% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 3.33% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.41% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.01% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXA and DAX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to SIXA (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs DAX's -45.58%.
On 5-year performance, SIXA leads with 12.50% vs 7.71% for DAX. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.48% for DAX.
SIXA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DAX is Europe Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.20% for DAX.
SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXA and DAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer