SIXA vs. ACEP
SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) and ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SIXA charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACEP.
Performance
SIXA vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly lower than ACEP's 24.65% return.
SIXA
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 1Y
- 19.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.23%
ACEP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- YTD
- 24.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.53K | $36.84K | $48.24K | |
| $1.65M | $1.61M | $862.84K |
SIXA vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 15.76% | 3.48% |
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 24.65% | 8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXA and ACEP is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.54 |
SIXA vs. ACEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXA
ACEP
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXA
ACEP
Technology
SIXA
ACEP
Healthcare
SIXA
ACEP
Financial Services
SIXA
ACEP
Communication Services
SIXA
ACEP
Consumer Cyclical
SIXA
ACEP
Energy
SIXA
ACEP
Industrials
SIXA
ACEP
Real Estate
SIXA
ACEP
Utilities
SIXA
ACEP
-
Basic Materials
SIXA
-
ACEP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXA vs. ACEP — Risk / Return Rank
SIXA
ACEP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIXA vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIXA | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIXA vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and ACEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXA | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -7.06% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.44% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -1.74% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | — | — |
Volatility
SIXA vs. ACEP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXA | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.12% | 16.86% | -7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 16.86% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 16.86% | -3.60% |
SIXA vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ACEP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXA vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison
SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 1.96% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXA and ACEP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACEP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACEP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.45% for ACEP.
Find the right allocation for SIXA and ACEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer