PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIVLX vs. WXCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIVLX vs. WXCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class (SIVLX) and William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVLX achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than WXCIX's 52.50% return.


SIVLX

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
9.13%
6M
9.89%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*

WXCIX

1D
0.87%
1M
15.91%
YTD
52.50%
6M
58.75%
1Y
92.32%
3Y*
35.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVLX vs. WXCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SIVLX
Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class
9.13%37.79%-3.34%6.97%
WXCIX
William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I
52.50%28.21%13.49%15.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVLX and WXCIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023

0.49

The correlation between SIVLX and WXCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIVLX vs. WXCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVLX
SIVLX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SIVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

WXCIX
WXCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
WXCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WXCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVLX vs. WXCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class (SIVLX) and William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIVLXWXCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

4.17

-1.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

5.00

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.71

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

6.14

-3.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.92

22.15

-14.23

SIVLX vs. WXCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is lower than the WXCIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVLX and WXCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIVLXWXCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

4.17

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

2.04

-1.25

Drawdowns

SIVLX vs. WXCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVLX drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, which is greater than WXCIX's maximum drawdown of -19.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVLX and WXCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIVLXWXCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.09%

-19.66%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-14.78%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.51%

-19.66%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

0.00%

-5.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-3.15%

-2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

4.10%

-0.37%

Volatility

SIVLX vs. WXCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class (SIVLX) is 3.81%, while William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX) has a volatility of 10.22%. This indicates that SIVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WXCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIVLXWXCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

10.22%

-6.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

19.50%

-9.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

22.52%

-10.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

17.99%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.60%

17.99%

-5.39%

SIVLX vs. WXCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVLX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than WXCIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIVLX vs. WXCIX - Dividend Comparison

SIVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than WXCIX's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIVLX
Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class
4.63%5.05%4.23%2.93%1.70%3.56%1.38%3.06%3.30%3.41%
WXCIX
William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I
3.62%5.52%0.00%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIVLX and WXCIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WXCIX has higher volatility (10.22%) compared to SIVLX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVLX dropped -33.09% vs WXCIX's -19.66%.

WXCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIVLX and WXCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer