PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SITEX vs. SMSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SITEX vs. SMSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SITEX achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly lower than SMSAX's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SITEX has underperformed SMSAX with an annualized return of 3.75%, while SMSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.80% annualized return.


SITEX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.36%
YTD
3.68%
6M
4.40%
1Y
16.20%
3Y*
11.80%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
3.75%

SMSAX

1D
0.56%
1M
3.09%
YTD
7.33%
6M
8.20%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
4.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SITEX vs. SMSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SITEX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
3.68%19.86%2.65%13.56%-15.44%-5.84%4.04%14.37%-8.72%14.26%
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
7.33%10.62%6.42%7.21%-4.95%1.47%12.06%4.85%-3.68%5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SITEX and SMSAX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010

0.37

The correlation between SITEX and SMSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SITEX vs. SMSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SITEX
SITEX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SITEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SITEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SITEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SITEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SITEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SMSAX
SMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SITEX vs. SMSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SITEXSMSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.62

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

4.63

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.13

20.00

-7.87

SITEX vs. SMSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SITEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the SMSAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SITEX and SMSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SITEXSMSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

3.14

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

1.06

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

1.05

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.78

-0.09

Drawdowns

SITEX vs. SMSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SITEX drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, which is greater than SMSAX's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITEX and SMSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SITEXSMSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.23%

-10.98%

-34.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.56%

-3.66%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.06%

-5.93%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.38%

-9.72%

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.92%

-10.98%

-17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-2.11%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

0.85%

+0.55%

Volatility

SITEX vs. SMSAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) have volatilities of 1.96% and 1.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SITEXSMSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

1.96%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.03%

4.29%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.88%

5.40%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.11%

4.67%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

4.61%

+3.86%

SITEX vs. SMSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SITEX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SMSAX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SITEX vs. SMSAX - Dividend Comparison

SITEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than SMSAX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SITEX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
6.27%6.27%5.68%5.16%1.62%3.43%0.38%2.18%2.47%3.90%1.58%0.52%
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
4.73%5.08%5.54%4.35%2.13%7.61%2.79%1.01%4.94%2.20%0.07%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


SITEX and SMSAX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMSAX has higher volatility (1.96%) compared to SITEX (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SITEX dropped -45.23% vs SMSAX's -10.98%.

SMSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SITEX and SMSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer