PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SITEX vs. PYELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SITEX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SITEX achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly higher than PYELX's 1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SITEX has underperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 3.28%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.


SITEX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.56%
6M
0.97%
YTD
3.52%
1Y
12.32%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
3.28%
ALL TIME*
6.53%

PYELX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.01%
6M
-0.52%
YTD
1.46%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
33.92%
5Y*
17.67%
10Y*
9.91%
ALL TIME*
6.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SITEX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SITEX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
3.52%19.86%2.65%13.56%-15.44%-5.84%4.04%14.37%-8.72%14.26%
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
1.46%139.58%-3.48%13.16%-11.28%-7.83%1.79%13.92%-8.16%15.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SITEX and PYELX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.79

The correlation between SITEX and PYELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SITEX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SITEX
SITEX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SITEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SITEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SITEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SITEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SITEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PYELX
PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SITEX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SITEXPYELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.28

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.34

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

4.03

+4.84

SITEX vs. PYELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SITEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the PYELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SITEX and PYELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SITEX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SITEX drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, which is greater than PYELX's maximum drawdown of -35.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITEX and PYELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SITEXPYELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.23%

-35.29%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.56%

-7.22%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.89%

-8.12%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-24.24%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.92%

-26.58%

-2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-2.34%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-16.27%

+9.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

2.40%

-0.96%

Volatility

SITEX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX) is 1.23%, while Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that SITEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SITEXPYELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.72%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.15%

6.02%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.93%

6.76%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

45.33%

-38.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.42%

32.68%

-24.26%

SITEX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SITEX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SITEX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison

SITEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than PYELX's 7.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
7.14%6.28%7.08%5.38%5.93%5.36%4.69%5.46%6.67%6.15%5.44%5.26%
SITEX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
6.29%6.27%5.68%5.16%1.62%3.43%0.38%2.18%2.47%3.90%1.58%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SITEX and PYELX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYELX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to SITEX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SITEX dropped -45.23% vs PYELX's -35.29%.

SITEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SITEX and PYELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer