PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) and AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIS.TO achieves a 33.17% return, which is significantly higher than AGF-B.TO's 11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SIS.TO has underperformed AGF-B.TO with an annualized return of 17.59%, while AGF-B.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.55% annualized return.


SIS.TO

1D
0.87%
1M
6.35%
YTD
33.17%
6M
40.53%
1Y
61.12%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
17.59%

AGF-B.TO

1D
4.13%
1M
2.99%
YTD
11.68%
6M
22.85%
1Y
54.32%
3Y*
40.79%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
19.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
33.17%17.77%34.86%12.15%-24.44%35.92%7.37%10.42%-26.61%71.44%
AGF-B.TO
AGF Management Ltd
11.68%59.26%45.89%15.54%-10.40%43.95%1.07%41.60%-38.19%36.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SIS.TO and AGF-B.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.16

The correlation between SIS.TO and AGF-B.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SIS.TO:

CA$2.19B

AGF-B.TO:

CA$1.18B

EPS

SIS.TO:

CA$1.10

AGF-B.TO:

CA$1.73

PE Ratio

SIS.TO:

27.43

AGF-B.TO:

10.35

PEG Ratio

SIS.TO:

0.43

AGF-B.TO:

0.27

PS Ratio

SIS.TO:

2.33

AGF-B.TO:

2.13

PB Ratio

SIS.TO:

3.32

AGF-B.TO:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

SIS.TO:

CA$928.84M

AGF-B.TO:

CA$561.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SIS.TO:

CA$362.29M

AGF-B.TO:

CA$342.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

SIS.TO:

CA$176.47M

AGF-B.TO:

CA$163.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIS.TO
SIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AGF-B.TO
AGF-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AGF-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) and AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIS.TOAGF-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.32

2.13

+4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

6.16

+12.36

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the AGF-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIS.TO and AGF-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIS.TOAGF-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

1.66

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.83

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.60

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.15

+0.24

Drawdowns

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.48%, smaller than the maximum AGF-B.TO drawdown of -85.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIS.TO and AGF-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIS.TOAGF-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.48%

-85.07%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-25.57%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.99%

-25.57%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.22%

-29.90%

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.16%

-65.63%

+3.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-12.95%

+12.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.77%

-49.83%

+29.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

8.84%

-5.53%

Volatility

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) is 6.66%, while AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that SIS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGF-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIS.TOAGF-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

7.81%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.37%

27.21%

-7.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.64%

32.92%

-9.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.92%

29.25%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.32%

32.85%

-0.53%

Dividends

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

SIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than AGF-B.TO's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGF-B.TO
AGF Management Ltd
2.85%3.01%4.26%5.58%5.52%4.07%5.26%4.97%6.64%3.91%3.83%11.35%
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
1.85%2.40%2.65%3.42%3.62%2.54%3.23%3.11%2.91%1.73%1.98%3.09%

Financials

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Savaria Corporation and AGF Management Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
235.55M
143.70M
(SIS.TO) Total Revenue
(AGF-B.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

SIS.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Savaria Corporation and AGF Management Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.0%
50.9%
Portfolio components
SIS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a gross profit of 91.74M and revenue of 235.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

AGF-B.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported a gross profit of 73.16M and revenue of 143.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

SIS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported an operating income of 33.15M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

AGF-B.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported an operating income of 33.41M and revenue of 143.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.3%.

SIS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a net income of 22.68M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

AGF-B.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported a net income of 18.04M and revenue of 143.70M, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SIS.TO and AGF-B.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIS.TO and AGF-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer