SIOO vs. EINC
SIOO (VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIOO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the S&P 100, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. SIOO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
SIOO vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 29.71% return.
SIOO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 28.55%
- YTD
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- 33.52%
- 3Y*
- 29.16%
- 5Y*
- 23.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
SIOO vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 7.30% | 1.16% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 29.71% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIOO and EINC is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIOO vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
SIOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EINC
SIOO vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIOO | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIOO vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIOO | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -87.55% | +80.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.67% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -43.97% | +42.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility
SIOO vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIOO | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 15.45% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.40% | 19.58% | -9.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.40% | 25.33% | -14.93% |
SIOO vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIOO vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, more than EINC's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.41% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 8.69% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIOO and EINC have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SIOO.
SIOO has the higher dividend yield at 8.69%, compared with 3.41% for EINC.
SIOO is categorized as Derivative Income, while EINC is Energy Equities. SIOO tracks S&P 100, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SIOO and 0.45% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for SIOO and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer