PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIOO vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIOO vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 37.50% return.


SIOO

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.52%
YTD
6.19%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
-1.55%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
37.50%
6M
36.36%
1Y
45.51%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIOO vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIOO and COMT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIOO vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIOO

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIOO vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIOO vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIOOCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.20

+1.31

Drawdowns

SIOO vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIOOCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-51.89%

+45.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-6.30%

+5.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-24.06%

+23.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

Volatility

SIOO vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIOOCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

21.36%

-11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

21.07%

-10.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

18.89%

-8.53%

SIOO vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIOO vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than COMT's 5.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.63%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
SIOO
VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF
7.44%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIOO and COMT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SIOO.

SIOO has the higher dividend yield at 7.44%, compared with 5.63% for COMT.

SIOO is categorized as Derivative Income, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SIOO and 0.48% for COMT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIOO and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer