SIO vs. AINP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SIO (Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF) and AINP (Allspring Income Plus ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SIO returned 6.63% vs 6.37% for AINP. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AINP.

Performance

SIO vs. AINP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF (SIO) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIO achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than AINP's 1.11% return.

SIO

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: 7.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AINP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.44%
• 1Y: 6.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIO vs. AINP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIO Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF	0.79%	9.29%	-1.59%
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	1.11%	7.53%	-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SIO and AINP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024	0.67

The correlation between SIO and AINP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIO vs. AINP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIO

SIO Risk / Return Rank: 47
SIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SIO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SIO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

AINP

AINP Risk / Return Rank: 60
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 64
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIO vs. AINP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF (SIO) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIO	AINP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.96	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.97	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.39	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	2.55	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.78	10.47	-2.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIO vs. AINP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the AINP Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIO and AINP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIO	AINP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	1.96	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	1.36	-0.04

Drawdowns

SIO vs. AINP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIO drawdown since its inception was -6.94%, which is greater than AINP's maximum drawdown of -2.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIO and AINP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIO	AINP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-2.61%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.62%	-2.51%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-0.22%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-0.47%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	0.61%	+0.24%

Volatility

SIO vs. AINP - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF (SIO) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) have volatilities of 1.15% and 1.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIO	AINP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	1.14%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.97%	2.45%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.38%	3.27%	+1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.00%	3.63%	+1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.00%	3.63%	+1.37%

SIO vs. AINP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AINP's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIO vs. AINP - Dividend Comparison

SIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than AINP's 5.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	5.78%	5.03%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%
SIO Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF	6.94%	6.80%	5.30%	5.37%	3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIO and AINP in my portfolio?

SIO and AINP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIO or AINP?

SIO has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to AINP (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIO dropped -6.94% vs AINP's -2.61%.

Which ETF is better, SIO or AINP?

On 1-year performance, SIO leads with 6.63% vs 6.37% for AINP. On fees, AINP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIO or AINP?

Over the 1-year period, SIO has performed better with a 6.63% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIO or AINP?

AINP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIO or AINP?

SIO has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 5.78% for AINP.

What is the main difference between SIO and AINP?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SIO and 0.36% for AINP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AINP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.