SIMS vs. BKGI
SIMS (SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIMS is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, while BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. SIMS is passively managed, while BKGI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIMS returned 12.52%/yr vs 22.14%/yr for BKGI. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIMS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.
Performance
SIMS vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than BKGI's 12.20% return.
SIMS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 39.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
BKGI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 21.78%
- 3Y*
- 22.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIMS vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF | 13.06% | 23.75% | -0.27% | 7.43% | -0.63% |
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 12.20% | 37.53% | 12.35% | 9.72% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIMS and BKGI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SIMS and BKGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIMS vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIMS
BKGI
Industrials
Technology
-
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
SIMS
BKGI
Technology
SIMS
BKGI
-
Energy
SIMS
BKGI
Communication Services
SIMS
BKGI
Consumer Cyclical
SIMS
BKGI
-
Basic Materials
SIMS
BKGI
-
Utilities
SIMS
BKGI
Consumer Defensive
SIMS
-
BKGI
-
Financial Services
SIMS
-
BKGI
-
Healthcare
SIMS
-
BKGI
-
Real Estate
SIMS
-
BKGI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIMS vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank
SIMS
BKGI
SIMS vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIMS | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 3.55 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 11.67 | -5.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIMS | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.89 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.61 | -1.35 |
Drawdowns
SIMS vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and BKGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIMS | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -14.79% | -29.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.79% | -6.16% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.78% | -14.16% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -3.14% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -2.57% | -13.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.03% | 1.87% | +4.16% |
Volatility
SIMS vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 4.17%. This indicates that SIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIMS | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 4.17% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.95% | 9.04% | +5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 11.59% | +11.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 14.07% | +11.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 14.07% | +11.95% |
SIMS vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIMS vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison
SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than BKGI's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 2.69% | 2.65% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF | 0.57% | 0.66% | 0.88% | 1.49% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.58% | 1.24% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIMS and BKGI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIMS has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to BKGI (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMS dropped -43.97% vs BKGI's -14.79%.
On 3-year performance, BKGI leads with 22.14% vs 12.52% for SIMS. On fees, SIMS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, BKGI has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BKGI has performed better with a 22.14% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIMS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.
BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.57% for SIMS.
SIMS is categorized as Global Equities, while BKGI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SIMS and 0.65% for BKGI.
BKGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIMS and BKGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer