PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILVX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SILVX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI U.S. Large Equity Fund (SILVX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILVX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 24.17% return.


SILVX

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
7.80%
6M
7.24%
1Y
18.67%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
10.36%

YFSIX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.70%
YTD
24.17%
6M
26.91%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILVX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SILVX
SGI U.S. Large Equity Fund
7.80%8.89%17.65%10.43%-12.99%17.31%11.48%29.22%0.19%16.76%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
24.17%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SILVX and YFSIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between SILVX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SILVX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILVX
SILVX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SILVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SILVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILVX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI U.S. Large Equity Fund (SILVX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SILVXYFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.68

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.48

5.24

+5.24

SILVX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILVX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SILVX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILVX drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILVX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILVXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-35.10%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.87%

-14.20%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

-14.20%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

-25.14%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-3.18%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-4.89%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

4.53%

-2.78%

Volatility

SILVX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SGI U.S. Large Equity Fund (SILVX) is 2.66%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that SILVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILVXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

6.52%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

21.38%

-14.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.48%

21.84%

-12.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.22%

15.54%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

16.30%

-1.33%

SILVX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILVX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SILVX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

SILVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SILVX
SGI U.S. Large Equity Fund
8.23%8.87%23.03%4.68%4.09%15.68%0.61%4.37%4.43%7.34%2.61%7.04%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SILVX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to SILVX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILVX dropped -31.29% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

SILVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SILVX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer