SILG.L vs. CIBR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index, while CIBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SILG.L returned 45.51%/yr vs 22.15%/yr for CIBR.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SILG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.L.

Performance

SILG.L vs. CIBR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SILG.L is traded in GBP, while CIBR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILG.L achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR.L's 25.53% return.

SILG.L

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 5.62%
• 6M: 16.67%
• 1Y: 98.68%
• 3Y*: 45.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIBR.L

• 1D: -2.60%
• 1M: 29.75%
• YTD: 25.53%
• 6M: 20.36%
• 1Y: 22.63%
• 3Y*: 22.15%
• 5Y*: 15.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILG.L vs. CIBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	5.62%	153.98%	13.53%	-6.34%	-8.01%
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation	25.53%	-0.09%	21.03%	33.79%	-10.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SILG.L and CIBR.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022	0.14

The correlation between SILG.L and CIBR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SILG.L vs. CIBR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILG.L

SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 54
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CIBR.L

CIBR.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
CIBR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CIBR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CIBR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CIBR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
CIBR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILG.L vs. CIBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SILG.L	CIBR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	0.88	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.37	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.18	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	0.93	+2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	2.11	+5.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SILG.L vs. CIBR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the CIBR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILG.L and CIBR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SILG.L	CIBR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	0.88	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.69	-0.02

Drawdowns

SILG.L vs. CIBR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILG.L drawdown since its inception was -32.00%, which is greater than CIBR.L's maximum drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILG.L and CIBR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SILG.L	CIBR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.00%	-26.65%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.90%	-24.29%	-6.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.90%	-25.48%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.56%	-3.05%	-21.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.52%	-9.33%	-3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.74%	10.68%	+2.06%

Volatility

SILG.L vs. CIBR.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a higher volatility of 18.48% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) at 12.21%. This indicates that SILG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SILG.L	CIBR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.48%	12.21%	+6.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.95%	22.57%	+17.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.23%	25.58%	+23.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.40%	23.70%	+15.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.40%	23.78%	+15.62%

SILG.L vs. CIBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SILG.L vs. CIBR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SILG.L nor CIBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SILG.L and CIBR.L in my portfolio?

SILG.L and CIBR.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SILG.L or CIBR.L?

On fees, CIBR.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SILG.L or CIBR.L?

CIBR.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

What is the main difference between SILG.L and CIBR.L?

SILG.L is categorized as Silver, while CIBR.L is Technology Equities. SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index, while CIBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SILG.L and 0.60% for CIBR.L.