CIBR.L vs. IITU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L).
CIBR.L and IITU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIBR.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on May 27, 2020. IITU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both CIBR.L and IITU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CIBR.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIBR.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | -13.27% | 7.58% | 18.96% | 40.83% | -27.53% | 19.58% | 35.46% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -8.64% | 23.07% | 38.50% | 58.65% | -29.11% | 34.44% | 33.69% |
Different Trading Currencies
CIBR.L is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR.L achieves a -13.27% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's -11.77% return.
CIBR.L
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- -13.27%
- 6M
- -17.70%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- -11.77%
- 6M
- -9.92%
- 1Y
- 25.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 22.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIBR.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIBR.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR.L
IITU.L
CIBR.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | 1.05 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.00 | 1.57 | -1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.20 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.42 | -1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 4.38 | -4.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 1.05 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.74 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.98 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR.L and IITU.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CIBR.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIBR.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CIBR.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR.L drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, roughly equal to the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR.L and IITU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -28.03% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.94% | -16.76% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.69% | -28.03% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.00% | -13.74% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -5.17% | -5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.74% | 6.26% | +2.48% |
Volatility
CIBR.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) at 5.11%. This indicates that CIBR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 5.11% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.87% | 14.85% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.55% | 23.90% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 23.02% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 21.71% | +1.86% |