PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIL vs. XAGUSD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIL vs. XAGUSD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Silver Spot Price US Dollar (XAGUSD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -11.58% return, which is significantly higher than XAGUSD=X's -19.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has underperformed XAGUSD=X with an annualized return of 5.01%, while XAGUSD=X has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.


SIL

1D
-3.20%
1M
-8.04%
6M
-21.68%
YTD
-11.58%
1Y
56.89%
3Y*
42.08%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
5.01%
ALL TIME*
4.29%

XAGUSD=X

1D
0.16%
1M
-7.36%
6M
-26.63%
YTD
-19.52%
1Y
55.98%
3Y*
34.81%
5Y*
17.76%
10Y*
11.01%
ALL TIME*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$67.23M$68.26M$119.44M
$32.83M$35.47M$59.31M

SIL vs. XAGUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
-11.58%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-18.35%40.30%34.78%-22.42%1.67%
XAGUSD=X
Silver Spot Price US Dollar
-19.52%148.50%21.59%-0.79%2.85%-11.48%47.14%15.71%-8.76%6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and XAGUSD=X is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.73

The correlation between SIL and XAGUSD=X has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIL vs. XAGUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XAGUSD=X
XAGUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XAGUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAGUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAGUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XAGUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAGUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIL vs. XAGUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Silver Spot Price US Dollar (XAGUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SILXAGUSD=XDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

0.82

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

1.56

+1.54

SIL vs. XAGUSD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the XAGUSD=X Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and XAGUSD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIL vs. XAGUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than XAGUSD=X's maximum drawdown of -75.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and XAGUSD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILXAGUSD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.99%

-75.36%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.41%

-52.52%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.41%

-52.52%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.91%

-52.52%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

-52.52%

-10.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.43%

-50.48%

+13.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.27%

-45.06%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.68%

30.72%

-12.04%

Volatility

SIL vs. XAGUSD=X - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Silver Spot Price US Dollar (XAGUSD=X) at 10.11%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAGUSD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILXAGUSD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.26%

10.11%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.94%

33.42%

+10.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.41%

55.99%

-2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.12%

35.41%

+4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.80%

31.41%

+8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIL and XAGUSD=X have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIL has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to XAGUSD=X (10.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs XAGUSD=X's -75.36%.

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIL and XAGUSD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer