PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIL vs. VGZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIL vs. VGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Vista Gold Corp. (VGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than VGZ's 18.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has outperformed VGZ with an annualized return of 9.80%, while VGZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.84% annualized return.


SIL

1D
3.27%
1M
-20.41%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
0.10%
1Y
70.58%
3Y*
46.50%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
9.80%

VGZ

1D
6.36%
1M
1.30%
YTD
18.78%
6M
-0.85%
1Y
134.16%
3Y*
63.73%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIL vs. VGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
-2.20%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-18.35%40.30%34.78%-22.42%1.67%
VGZ
Vista Gold Corp.
18.78%253.05%23.48%-8.73%-30.22%-34.31%48.97%38.10%-25.00%-26.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and VGZ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.53

The correlation between SIL and VGZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (10 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIL vs. VGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VGZ
VGZ Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIL vs. VGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Vista Gold Corp. (VGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SILVGZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.19

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

6.86

-1.76

SIL vs. VGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the VGZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and VGZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIL vs. VGZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, smaller than the maximum VGZ drawdown of -99.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and VGZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILVGZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.99%

-99.06%

+16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.08%

-42.30%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.08%

-46.23%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.29%

-78.19%

+23.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

-85.10%

+22.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.80%

-82.31%

+51.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.40%

-70.36%

+18.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.90%

19.65%

-5.75%

Volatility

SIL vs. VGZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Vista Gold Corp. (VGZ) at 16.84%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILVGZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.29%

16.84%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.57%

64.35%

-20.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.69%

81.23%

-29.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.64%

65.80%

-26.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.81%

66.60%

-26.79%

Dividends

SIL vs. VGZ - Dividend Comparison

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while VGZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.21%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%
VGZ
Vista Gold Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIL and VGZ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIL has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to VGZ (16.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs VGZ's -99.06%.

VGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIL and VGZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer