SIL vs. TFPM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while TFPM (Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SIL returned 46.50%/yr vs 28.25%/yr for TFPM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

SIL vs. TFPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly higher than TFPM's -11.94% return.

SIL

• 1D: 3.27%
• 1M: -20.41%
• YTD: -2.20%
• 6M: 0.10%
• 1Y: 70.58%
• 3Y*: 46.50%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

TFPM

• 1D: 4.14%
• 1M: -17.89%
• YTD: -11.94%
• 6M: -15.62%
• 1Y: 19.91%
• 3Y*: 28.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIL vs. TFPM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	-2.20%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	7.64%
TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp	-11.94%	123.03%	14.60%	-1.81%	14.71%	32.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and TFPM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021	0.63

Over the past year, SIL and TFPM have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.63, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SIL vs. TFPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 41
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 37

TFPM

TFPM Risk / Return Rank: 56
TFPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TFPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
TFPM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
TFPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
TFPM Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIL vs. TFPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIL	TFPM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.46	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	0.86	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.11	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	0.57	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.09	1.64	+3.45

SIL vs. TFPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the TFPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and TFPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIL vs. TFPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than TFPM's maximum drawdown of -36.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and TFPM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIL	TFPM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.99%	-36.48%	-46.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.08%	-34.87%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.08%	-34.87%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.80%	-29.27%	-1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.40%	-13.43%	-37.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.90%	12.18%	+1.72%

Volatility

SIL vs. TFPM - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) at 15.92%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIL	TFPM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.29%	15.92%	+3.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.57%	34.29%	+9.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.69%	43.51%	+8.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.64%	37.45%	+2.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.81%	37.45%	+2.36%

Dividends

SIL vs. TFPM - Dividend Comparison

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than TFPM's 0.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.21%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%
TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp	0.79%	0.68%	1.43%	1.54%	1.07%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIL and TFPM in my portfolio?

SIL and TFPM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIL or TFPM?

SIL has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to TFPM (15.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs TFPM's -36.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.