SIL vs. SLVO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) and SLVO (UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN) are both Silver funds - SIL tracks the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index while SLVO tracks the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SIL returned 56.89% vs 28.85% for SLVO. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

SIL vs. SLVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -11.58% return, which is significantly lower than SLVO's -4.64% return.

SIL

• 1D: -3.20%
• 1M: -8.04%
• 6M: -21.68%
• YTD: -11.58%
• 1Y: 56.89%
• 3Y*: 42.08%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 5.01%
• ALL TIME*: 4.29%

SLVO

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -3.21%
• 6M: -0.08%
• YTD: -4.64%
• 1Y: 28.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	$67.23M	$68.26M	$119.44M
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	$28.82M	$16.45M	$13.40M

SIL vs. SLVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	-11.58%	166.16%	-6.26%
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	-4.64%	71.20%	0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and SLVO is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024	0.78

The correlation between SIL and SLVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIL vs. SLVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 41
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 33

SLVO

SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 37
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIL vs. SLVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIL	SLVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	0.90	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.22	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.20	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.35	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.10	3.86	-0.77

SIL vs. SLVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the SLVO Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and SLVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIL vs. SLVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than SLVO's maximum drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and SLVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIL	SLVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.99%	-22.21%	-60.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.41%	-22.21%	-17.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.43%	-18.68%	-18.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.27%	-4.06%	-47.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.68%	7.75%	+10.93%

Volatility

SIL vs. SLVO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) at 10.22%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIL	SLVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.26%	10.22%	+3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.94%	31.70%	+12.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.41%	33.46%	+19.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.12%	26.77%	+13.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.80%	26.77%	+13.03%

SIL vs. SLVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIL and SLVO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

SIL vs. SLVO - Dividend Comparison

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than SLVO's 73.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.38%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	73.29%	19.35%	14.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIL and SLVO in my portfolio?

SIL and SLVO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIL or SLVO?

SIL has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to SLVO (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs SLVO's -22.21%.

Which ETF is better, SIL or SLVO?

On 1-year performance, SIL leads with 56.89% vs 28.85% for SLVO. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, SLVO has been the lower-risk option at 10.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIL or SLVO?

Over the 1-year period, SIL has performed better with a 56.89% return vs 28.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIL or SLVO?

SIL and SLVO have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIL or SLVO?

SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 73.29%, compared with 1.38% for SIL.

What is the main difference between SIL and SLVO?

SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while SLVO tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and UBS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.