SIL vs. IMRX
SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while IMRX (Immuneering Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SIL returned 46.50%/yr vs -24.01%/yr for IMRX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIL vs. IMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly higher than IMRX's -36.32% return.
SIL
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -20.41%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 70.58%
- 3Y*
- 46.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
IMRX
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -22.12%
- YTD
- -36.32%
- 6M
- -31.09%
- 1Y
- 113.78%
- 3Y*
- -24.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIL vs. IMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -2.20% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -12.89% |
IMRX Immuneering Corporation | -36.32% | 199.09% | -70.07% | 51.55% | -70.01% | -17.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIL and IMRX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIL vs. IMRX — Risk / Return Rank
SIL
IMRX
SIL vs. IMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Immuneering Corporation (IMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIL | IMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.98 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 3.30 | +1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIL vs. IMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, smaller than the maximum IMRX drawdown of -96.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and IMRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIL | IMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.99% | -96.86% | +13.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.08% | -57.67% | +20.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.08% | -90.98% | +53.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.80% | -87.24% | +56.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.40% | -77.61% | +26.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.90% | 34.56% | -20.66% |
Volatility
SIL vs. IMRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is 19.29%, while Immuneering Corporation (IMRX) has a volatility of 33.75%. This indicates that SIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIL | IMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.29% | 33.75% | -14.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.57% | 79.00% | -35.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.69% | 124.22% | -72.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.64% | 114.45% | -74.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.81% | 114.45% | -74.64% |
Dividends
SIL vs. IMRX - Dividend Comparison
SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while IMRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMRX Immuneering Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.21% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIL and IMRX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMRX has higher volatility (33.75%) compared to SIL (19.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs IMRX's -96.86%.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIL and IMRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer