SIL vs. CPNG
SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while CPNG (Coupang, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SIL returned 12.56%/yr vs -15.31%/yr for CPNG. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIL vs. CPNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly higher than CPNG's -28.70% return.
SIL
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -10.83%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 69.43%
- 3Y*
- 46.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
CPNG
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- -28.70%
- 6M
- -34.37%
- 1Y
- -40.14%
- 3Y*
- 0.44%
- 5Y*
- -15.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SIL vs. CPNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -2.20% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -9.72% |
CPNG Coupang, Inc. | -28.70% | 7.32% | 35.76% | 10.06% | -49.93% | -53.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIL and CPNG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIL vs. CPNG — Risk / Return Rank
SIL
CPNG
SIL vs. CPNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Coupang, Inc. (CPNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIL | CPNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.83 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | -0.74 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | -1.32 | +6.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIL vs. CPNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, roughly equal to the maximum CPNG drawdown of -85.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and CPNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIL | CPNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.99% | -85.28% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.08% | -54.91% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.08% | -54.91% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.77% | -79.01% | +26.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.80% | -73.51% | +42.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.40% | -64.19% | +12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.90% | 30.85% | -16.95% |
Volatility
SIL vs. CPNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is 19.29%, while Coupang, Inc. (CPNG) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that SIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIL | CPNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.29% | 21.03% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.57% | 39.57% | +4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.69% | 44.14% | +7.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.64% | 52.50% | -12.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.81% | 53.74% | -13.93% |
Dividends
SIL vs. CPNG - Dividend Comparison
SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while CPNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.21% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIL and CPNG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPNG has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to SIL (19.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs CPNG's -85.28%.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIL and CPNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer