PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIL vs. AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIL vs. AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly higher than AS's -5.06% return.


SIL

1D
3.27%
1M
-20.41%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
0.10%
1Y
70.58%
3Y*
46.50%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
9.80%

AS

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-5.06%
6M
-7.56%
1Y
-5.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIL vs. AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
-2.20%166.16%28.03%
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
-5.06%33.58%108.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and AS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIL vs. AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

AS
AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIL vs. AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SILASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.01

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

-0.18

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

-0.36

+5.45

SIL vs. AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the AS Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIL vs. AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than AS's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.99%

-40.71%

-42.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.08%

-28.78%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.80%

-15.49%

-15.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.40%

-13.29%

-38.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.90%

14.56%

-0.66%

Volatility

SIL vs. AS - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Amer Sports, Inc (AS) at 10.17%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.29%

10.17%

+9.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.57%

29.10%

+14.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.69%

41.31%

+10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.64%

49.55%

-9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.81%

49.55%

-9.74%

Dividends

SIL vs. AS - Dividend Comparison

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.21%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIL and AS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIL has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to AS (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs AS's -40.71%.

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIL and AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer