SIHY vs. HYEM
SIHY (Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF) and HYEM (VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SIHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield while HYEM tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIHY returned 9.23%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for HYEM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIHY charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYEM.
Performance
SIHY vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIHY achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM's 3.92% return.
SIHY
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYEM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 3.92%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 10.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.65%
SIHY vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIHY Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF | 1.74% | 8.13% | 8.67% | 13.31% | -7.73% | -0.00% |
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 3.92% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -13.39% | -2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIHY and HYEM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SIHY and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIHY vs. HYEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIHY
HYEM
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
SIHY
HYEM
Consumer Cyclical
SIHY
HYEM
-
Energy
SIHY
HYEM
-
Technology
SIHY
HYEM
-
Financial Services
SIHY
HYEM
-
Real Estate
SIHY
HYEM
-
Basic Materials
SIHY
HYEM
-
Communication Services
SIHY
HYEM
-
Utilities
SIHY
HYEM
-
Consumer Defensive
SIHY
HYEM
-
Healthcare
SIHY
HYEM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIHY vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank
SIHY
HYEM
SIHY vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF (SIHY) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIHY | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.04 | 2.39 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | 3.50 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.47 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 3.79 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 15.48 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIHY | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 2.39 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.54 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
SIHY vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIHY drawdown since its inception was -13.30%, smaller than the maximum HYEM drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIHY and HYEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIHY | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -30.96% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -2.73% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.36% | -5.23% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.10% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -4.40% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 0.67% | +0.09% |
Volatility
SIHY vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF (SIHY) is 1.16%, while VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that SIHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIHY | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 1.33% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 3.24% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 4.33% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.58% | 7.49% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.58% | 9.27% | -1.69% |
SIHY vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIHY has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIHY vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison
SIHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than HYEM's 6.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.52% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
SIHY Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF | 7.26% | 7.61% | 7.54% | 7.06% | 6.31% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIHY and HYEM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYEM has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to SIHY (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIHY dropped -13.30% vs HYEM's -30.96%.
On 3-year performance, HYEM leads with 11.00% vs 9.23% for SIHY. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SIHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYEM has performed better with a 11.00% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for SIHY.
SIHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 6.52% for HYEM.
SIHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield, while HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for SIHY and 0.40% for HYEM.
HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIHY and HYEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer