PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIHAX vs. XILSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIHAX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIHAX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 7.97% return.


SIHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.33%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
4.66%

XILSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.97%
YTD
7.97%
6M
10.49%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIHAX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIHAX
Guggenheim High Yield Fund
0.80%6.84%6.93%10.74%-10.51%4.36%4.55%11.26%-3.17%5.71%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
7.97%18.70%18.93%18.65%1.23%-1.10%7.37%2.60%-2.11%-8.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SIHAX and XILSX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIHAX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIHAX
SIHAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SIHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SIHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XILSX
XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIHAX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIHAXXILSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-78.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

43.21

-41.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

117.99

-116.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

805.46

-796.95

SIHAX vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIHAX and XILSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIHAXXILSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

8.17

-6.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

3.29

-2.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

1.63

-0.34

Drawdowns

SIHAX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIHAX drawdown since its inception was -36.72%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIHAX and XILSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIHAXXILSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.72%

-14.53%

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-0.21%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

-2.36%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.95%

-6.27%

-7.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-4.91%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.03%

+0.57%

Volatility

SIHAX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that SIHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIHAXXILSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

0.43%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

2.11%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

3.08%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

3.77%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

3.93%

+0.67%

SIHAX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIHAX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIHAX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

SIHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than XILSX's 8.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIHAX
Guggenheim High Yield Fund
6.32%6.39%5.45%4.91%4.75%3.70%4.79%5.44%6.86%5.53%6.09%7.53%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
8.81%9.51%13.06%12.82%2.68%2.04%5.20%6.63%6.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIHAX and XILSX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIHAX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to XILSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIHAX dropped -36.72% vs XILSX's -14.53%.

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIHAX and XILSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer