PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIFI vs. MEDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIFI vs. MEDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) and Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIFI achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than MEDI's 0.41% return.


SIFI

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.45%
1Y
6.31%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
10Y*

MEDI

1D
1.41%
1M
1.66%
YTD
0.41%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIFI vs. MEDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SIFI
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
1.26%8.83%5.05%8.75%0.99%
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
0.41%27.11%0.58%24.87%2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SIFI and MEDI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIFI vs. MEDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIFI
SIFI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SIFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MEDI
MEDI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MEDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDI Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDI Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIFI vs. MEDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) and Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIFIMEDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.18

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.36

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

3.96

+5.59

SIFI vs. MEDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the MEDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIFI and MEDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIFI vs. MEDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIFI drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum MEDI drawdown of -19.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIFI and MEDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIFIMEDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-19.24%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-15.34%

+12.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.46%

-19.24%

+15.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-3.76%

+3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-4.30%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

5.25%

-4.59%

Volatility

SIFI vs. MEDI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) is 0.79%, while Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that SIFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIFIMEDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

6.32%

-5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

15.71%

-13.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

20.22%

-16.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

18.68%

-13.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.91%

18.68%

-13.77%

SIFI vs. MEDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIFI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MEDI's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIFI vs. MEDI - Dividend Comparison

SIFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than MEDI's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
0.28%0.28%0.54%1.86%0.00%0.00%
SIFI
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
6.44%6.57%5.87%5.71%3.88%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIFI and MEDI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEDI has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to SIFI (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIFI dropped -14.68% vs MEDI's -19.24%.

On 3-year performance, MEDI leads with 13.92% vs 7.51% for SIFI. On fees, SIFI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SIFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MEDI has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIFI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MEDI.

SIFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.44%, compared with 0.28% for MEDI.

SIFI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while MEDI is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SIFI and 0.80% for MEDI.

SIFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIFI and MEDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer