PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIFI vs. LSEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIFI vs. LSEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIFI achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than LSEQ's 25.99% return.


SIFI

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.70%
1Y
7.56%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
10Y*

LSEQ

1D
1.89%
1M
2.58%
YTD
25.99%
6M
24.44%
1Y
22.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIFI vs. LSEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SIFI
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
1.27%8.83%5.05%2.65%
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
25.99%4.13%12.80%-1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SIFI and LSEQ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023

0.20

SIFI vs. LSEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIFI
LSEQ

Industrials

16.2%
6.5%

Technology

15.7%
-10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
17.3%

Energy

7.9%
15.0%

Real Estate

4.8%

-

Financial Services

4.4%
1.2%

Healthcare

3.9%
14.7%

Communication Services

3.0%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
5.2%

Utilities

1.9%
3.1%

Basic Materials

0.7%
27.3%

Industrials

SIFI
16.2%
LSEQ
6.5%

Technology

SIFI
15.7%
LSEQ
-10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SIFI
11.8%
LSEQ
17.3%

Energy

SIFI
7.9%
LSEQ
15.0%

Real Estate

SIFI
4.8%
LSEQ

-

Financial Services

SIFI
4.4%
LSEQ
1.2%

Healthcare

SIFI
3.9%
LSEQ
14.7%

Communication Services

SIFI
3.0%
LSEQ
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

SIFI
2.9%
LSEQ
5.2%

Utilities

SIFI
1.9%
LSEQ
3.1%

Basic Materials

SIFI
0.7%
LSEQ
27.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIFI vs. LSEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIFI
SIFI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SIFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

LSEQ
LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIFI vs. LSEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIFILSEQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

1.52

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

2.15

+1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.06

-0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.23

7.02

+4.22

SIFI vs. LSEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIFI Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the LSEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIFI and LSEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIFILSEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.52

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.16

-0.69

Drawdowns

SIFI vs. LSEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIFI drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, which is greater than LSEQ's maximum drawdown of -8.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIFI and LSEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIFILSEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-8.35%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-7.40%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-2.75%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-3.23%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

3.22%

-2.56%

Volatility

SIFI vs. LSEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) is 1.03%, while Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that SIFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIFILSEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

5.44%

-4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

12.73%

-10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

15.05%

-11.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.94%

14.32%

-9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

14.32%

-9.38%

SIFI vs. LSEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIFI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LSEQ's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIFI vs. LSEQ - Dividend Comparison

SIFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than LSEQ's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
1.75%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIFI
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
6.44%6.57%5.87%5.71%3.88%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIFI and LSEQ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSEQ has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to SIFI (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIFI dropped -14.68% vs LSEQ's -8.35%.

On 1-year performance, LSEQ leads with 22.72% vs 7.56% for SIFI. On fees, SIFI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SIFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LSEQ has performed better with a 22.72% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIFI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

SIFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.44%, compared with 1.75% for LSEQ.

SIFI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while LSEQ is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SIFI and 1.70% for LSEQ.

SIFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIFI and LSEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer