SIFI vs. EBIT
SIFI (Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF) and EBIT (Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIFI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Harbor, while EBIT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index. SIFI is actively managed, while EBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, SIFI returned 7.56% vs 30.06% for EBIT. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIFI charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for EBIT.
Performance
SIFI vs. EBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIFI achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than EBIT's 13.36% return.
SIFI
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBIT
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 30.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIFI vs. EBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SIFI Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF | 1.27% | 8.83% | 2.78% |
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF | 13.36% | 6.85% | 8.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIFI and EBIT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | 0.44 |
SIFI vs. EBIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIFI
EBIT
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Industrials
SIFI
EBIT
Technology
SIFI
EBIT
Consumer Cyclical
SIFI
EBIT
Energy
SIFI
EBIT
Real Estate
SIFI
EBIT
Financial Services
SIFI
EBIT
Healthcare
SIFI
EBIT
Communication Services
SIFI
EBIT
Consumer Defensive
SIFI
EBIT
Utilities
SIFI
EBIT
Basic Materials
SIFI
EBIT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIFI vs. EBIT — Risk / Return Rank
SIFI
EBIT
SIFI vs. EBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) and Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIFI | EBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 1.77 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 2.63 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.31 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 3.49 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.23 | 10.05 | +1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIFI | EBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.77 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.73 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
SIFI vs. EBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIFI drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum EBIT drawdown of -26.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIFI and EBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIFI | EBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -26.64% | +11.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -8.34% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.22% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -6.56% | +1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 2.90% | -2.24% |
Volatility
SIFI vs. EBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) is 1.03%, while Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that SIFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIFI | EBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 4.08% | -3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 10.64% | -8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 17.10% | -13.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 21.24% | -16.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 21.24% | -16.30% |
SIFI vs. EBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIFI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EBIT's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIFI vs. EBIT - Dividend Comparison
SIFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than EBIT's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF | 1.76% | 2.00% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIFI Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF | 6.44% | 6.57% | 5.87% | 5.71% | 3.88% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIFI and EBIT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EBIT has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to SIFI (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIFI dropped -14.68% vs EBIT's -26.64%.
On 1-year performance, EBIT leads with 30.06% vs 7.56% for SIFI. On fees, EBIT is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SIFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EBIT has performed better with a 30.06% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EBIT is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SIFI.
SIFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.44%, compared with 1.76% for EBIT.
SIFI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while EBIT is Small Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SIFI and 0.29% for EBIT.
SIFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIFI and EBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer