SIFFX vs. ATCSX
SIFFX (Victory Pioneer Securitized Income Fund Class A) and ATCSX (Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, SIFFX returned 7.06%/yr vs 4.40%/yr for ATCSX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIFFX charges 0.90%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for ATCSX.
Performance
SIFFX vs. ATCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIFFX achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than ATCSX's 4.38% return.
SIFFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 5.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATCSX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 4.26%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 1.63%
SIFFX vs. ATCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIFFX Victory Pioneer Securitized Income Fund Class A | 1.94% | 6.57% | 7.33% | 9.72% | -6.17% | 1.62% |
ATCSX Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund | 4.38% | 3.71% | 4.25% | -2.23% | -6.60% | -1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIFFX and ATCSX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2021 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIFFX vs. ATCSX — Risk / Return Rank
SIFFX
ATCSX
SIFFX vs. ATCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Pioneer Securitized Income Fund Class A (SIFFX) and Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund (ATCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIFFX | ATCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 1.99 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.48 | 2.70 | +1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.39 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 3.68 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 11.24 | -1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIFFX | ATCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.99 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.05 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
SIFFX vs. ATCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIFFX drawdown since its inception was -7.08%, smaller than the maximum ATCSX drawdown of -53.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIFFX and ATCSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIFFX | ATCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.08% | -53.70% | +46.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.55% | -3.31% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.55% | -53.70% | +52.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -46.22% | +46.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -10.12% | +8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 1.08% | -0.51% |
Volatility
SIFFX vs. ATCSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory Pioneer Securitized Income Fund Class A (SIFFX) is 0.60%, while Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund (ATCSX) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that SIFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIFFX | ATCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 1.88% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.54% | 4.45% | -2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 6.14% | -3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 50.60% | -47.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 35.94% | -33.06% |
SIFFX vs. ATCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIFFX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than ATCSX's 4.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIFFX vs. ATCSX - Dividend Comparison
SIFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, less than ATCSX's 9.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATCSX Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund | 9.40% | 9.26% | 12.69% | 3.16% | 0.00% | 2.48% | 1.46% | 3.04% | 0.27% | 2.76% | 2.91% |
SIFFX Victory Pioneer Securitized Income Fund Class A | 6.19% | 6.37% | 5.01% | 4.77% | 4.90% | 3.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIFFX and ATCSX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATCSX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to SIFFX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIFFX dropped -7.08% vs ATCSX's -53.70%.
SIFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIFFX and ATCSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer