PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATCSX vs. WAVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATCSX vs. WAVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anchor Risk Managed Income Strategies Fund (ATCSX) and Wavelength Fund (WAVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATCSX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than WAVLX's 1.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ATCSX has underperformed WAVLX with an annualized return of 1.14%, while WAVLX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.82% annualized return.


ATCSX

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.72%
6M
-1.57%
YTD
-0.58%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
3.09%
5Y*
-0.79%
10Y*
1.14%
ALL TIME*
1.36%

WAVLX

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.49%
6M
0.71%
YTD
1.96%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
3.82%
ALL TIME*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ATCSX vs. WAVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATCSX
Anchor Risk Managed Income Strategies Fund
-0.58%3.71%4.25%-2.23%-6.60%-0.21%11.02%5.14%-4.18%2.14%
WAVLX
Wavelength Fund
1.96%9.86%5.21%7.02%-11.34%1.72%8.29%13.07%-1.46%5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ATCSX and WAVLX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.33

Over the past year, ATCSX and WAVLX have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATCSX vs. WAVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATCSX
ATCSX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ATCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ATCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

WAVLX
WAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATCSX vs. WAVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anchor Risk Managed Income Strategies Fund (ATCSX) and Wavelength Fund (WAVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATCSXWAVLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.29

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

2.22

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.77

8.41

-6.64

ATCSX vs. WAVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATCSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the WAVLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATCSX and WAVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATCSX vs. WAVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATCSX drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, which is greater than WAVLX's maximum drawdown of -14.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATCSX and WAVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATCSXWAVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-14.39%

-39.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.98%

-3.03%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.70%

-5.33%

-48.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.70%

-14.39%

-39.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.70%

-14.39%

-39.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.78%

-1.41%

-47.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-2.96%

-7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

0.80%

+0.82%

Volatility

ATCSX vs. WAVLX - Volatility Comparison

Anchor Risk Managed Income Strategies Fund (ATCSX) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Wavelength Fund (WAVLX) at 1.15%. This indicates that ATCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATCSXWAVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

1.15%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.94%

3.48%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.50%

4.36%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.66%

5.63%

+45.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.96%

5.31%

+30.65%

ATCSX vs. WAVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATCSX has a 4.58% expense ratio, which is higher than WAVLX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATCSX vs. WAVLX - Dividend Comparison

ATCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.25%, more than WAVLX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATCSX
Anchor Risk Managed Income Strategies Fund
10.25%9.26%12.69%3.16%0.00%2.48%1.46%3.04%0.27%2.76%2.91%0.00%
WAVLX
Wavelength Fund
3.55%3.67%4.41%4.83%3.63%2.83%2.21%4.96%2.65%2.09%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATCSX and WAVLX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATCSX has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to WAVLX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATCSX dropped -53.70% vs WAVLX's -14.39%.

WAVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATCSX and WAVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer