SIBPX vs. SWSBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX).
SIBPX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Sep 1, 1994. SWSBX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government/Credit 1-5 Year Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2017.
Performance
SIBPX vs. SWSBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIBPX vs. SWSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio | -1.04% | 6.50% | 0.78% | 2.90% | -2.51% | -1.73% | 3.34% | 3.84% | -0.72% | -0.13% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | -0.16% | 6.06% | 3.42% | 3.95% | -5.89% | -1.28% | 4.47% | 4.96% | 1.34% | 0.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIBPX achieves a -1.04% return, which is significantly lower than SWSBX's -0.16% return.
SIBPX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- —
SWSBX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIBPX vs. SWSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIBPX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSBX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIBPX vs. SWSBX — Risk / Return Rank
SIBPX
SWSBX
SIBPX vs. SWSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIBPX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 1.59 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 2.60 | -1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.33 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 2.71 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 9.85 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIBPX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.59 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.43 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.76 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIBPX and SWSBX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SIBPX vs. SWSBX - Dividend Comparison
SIBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than SWSBX's 3.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio | 2.00% | 2.24% | 2.31% | 1.54% | 0.14% | 1.39% | 0.58% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.03% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.79% | 4.09% | 3.66% | 2.36% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 1.82% | 2.41% | 2.12% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
SIBPX vs. SWSBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIBPX drawdown since its inception was -5.57%, smaller than the maximum SWSBX drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIBPX and SWSBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIBPX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -9.06% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.78% | -1.54% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.93% | -9.06% | +4.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -1.13% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -1.81% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.42% | +0.45% |
Volatility
SIBPX vs. SWSBX - Volatility Comparison
Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) has a higher volatility of 1.60% compared to Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) at 0.73%. This indicates that SIBPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIBPX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 0.73% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 1.49% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30% | 2.40% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.29% | 2.95% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.72% | 2.47% | +0.25% |