PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIBPX vs. BATAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIBPX vs. BATAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIBPX achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than BATAX's 1.87% return.


SIBPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*

BATAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.32%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
3.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIBPX vs. BATAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIBPX
Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio
-0.75%6.50%0.78%2.90%-2.51%-1.73%3.34%3.84%-0.72%-0.13%
BATAX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio
1.87%7.37%7.34%6.43%-5.87%1.72%2.75%6.76%2.20%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SIBPX and BATAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.55

The correlation between SIBPX and BATAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIBPX vs. BATAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIBPX
SIBPX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SIBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SIBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BATAX
BATAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BATAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BATAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIBPX vs. BATAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIBPXBATAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

3.06

-2.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

7.71

-6.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

2.14

-1.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

6.69

-5.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.86

27.99

-25.14

SIBPX vs. BATAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIBPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the BATAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIBPX and BATAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIBPXBATAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

3.06

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

1.57

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.11

-0.65

Drawdowns

SIBPX vs. BATAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIBPX drawdown since its inception was -5.57%, smaller than the maximum BATAX drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIBPX and BATAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIBPXBATAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-17.42%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.30%

-0.94%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.28%

-1.15%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.83%

-8.12%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.10%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-1.30%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.22%

+0.88%

Volatility

SIBPX vs. BATAX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) at 0.67%. This indicates that SIBPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIBPXBATAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.67%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

1.43%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

2.04%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.36%

2.18%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.75%

3.07%

-0.32%

SIBPX vs. BATAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIBPX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than BATAX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIBPX vs. BATAX - Dividend Comparison

SIBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than BATAX's 5.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BATAX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio
5.74%5.92%5.45%3.91%3.14%1.82%3.22%4.73%5.36%4.10%0.40%
SIBPX
Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio
2.04%2.24%2.31%1.54%0.14%1.39%0.58%0.99%1.21%1.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIBPX and BATAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIBPX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to BATAX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIBPX dropped -5.57% vs BATAX's -17.42%.

BATAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIBPX and BATAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer