PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYU.L achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than WIGG.L's 1.47% return.


SHYU.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-1.85%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
2.26%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.84%

WIGG.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-1.70%-4.17%8.56%4.72%2.04%4.96%1.60%9.12%9.78%
WIGG.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.47%8.82%4.80%11.01%-12.90%4.06%13.22%14.56%-3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYU.L and WIGG.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2018

0.20

The correlation between SHYU.L and WIGG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYU.L
SHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

WIGG.L
WIGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
WIGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYU.LWIGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.39

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

2.13

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

8.95

-8.52

SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the WIGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYU.L and WIGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYU.LWIGG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

1.98

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.46

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Drawdowns

SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYU.L drawdown since its inception was -15.01%, smaller than the maximum WIGG.L drawdown of -23.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYU.L and WIGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYU.LWIGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.01%

-23.44%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.61%

-3.52%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-4.30%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.08%

-17.35%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.14%

-0.10%

-9.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-3.59%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

0.84%

+2.99%

Volatility

SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L) at 1.30%. This indicates that SHYU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WIGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYU.LWIGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

1.30%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

2.97%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

3.80%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

5.92%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.74%

7.44%

+2.30%

SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WIGG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYU.L vs. WIGG.L - Dividend Comparison

SHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WIGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%6.32%5.76%4.82%4.27%5.16%5.58%5.52%5.74%5.16%5.87%
WIGG.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
6.92%5.58%5.74%5.08%4.47%3.89%4.24%4.53%3.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYU.L and WIGG.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SHYU.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SHYU.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WIGG.L.

SHYU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while WIGG.L is High Yield Bonds. SHYU.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped Index, while WIGG.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHYU.L and 0.55% for WIGG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYU.L and WIGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer