PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYU.L vs. UB32.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYU.L vs. UB32.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB32.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHYU.L is traded in GBP, while UB32.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UB32.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYU.L achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than UB32.L's 26.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SHYU.L has underperformed UB32.L with an annualized return of 4.84%, while UB32.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.


SHYU.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-1.85%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
2.26%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.84%

UB32.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
6.18%
YTD
26.16%
6M
28.70%
1Y
54.13%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYU.L vs. UB32.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-1.70%-4.17%8.56%4.72%2.04%4.96%1.60%9.12%4.39%-3.89%
UB32.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
26.16%26.36%8.34%3.61%-10.46%-1.87%13.90%13.43%-9.29%24.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYU.L and UB32.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between SHYU.L and UB32.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYU.L vs. UB32.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYU.L
SHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

UB32.L
UB32.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UB32.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB32.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB32.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UB32.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB32.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYU.L vs. UB32.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB32.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYU.LUB32.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.59

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

5.17

-4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

18.40

-17.97

SHYU.L vs. UB32.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the UB32.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYU.L and UB32.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYU.LUB32.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

3.25

-3.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.55

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.61

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.50

+0.09

Drawdowns

SHYU.L vs. UB32.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYU.L drawdown since its inception was -15.01%, smaller than the maximum UB32.L drawdown of -30.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYU.L and UB32.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYU.LUB32.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.01%

-30.25%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.61%

-10.68%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-14.80%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.08%

-23.87%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.01%

-27.71%

+12.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.14%

-2.44%

-6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-9.93%

+5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

2.98%

+0.85%

Volatility

SHYU.L vs. UB32.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) is 1.72%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB32.L) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that SHYU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UB32.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYU.LUB32.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

7.38%

-5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

14.38%

-10.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

17.01%

-10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

16.51%

-8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.74%

18.53%

-8.79%

SHYU.L vs. UB32.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UB32.L's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYU.L vs. UB32.L - Dividend Comparison

SHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UB32.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%6.32%5.76%4.82%4.27%5.16%5.58%5.52%5.74%5.16%5.87%
UB32.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.70%2.25%2.16%2.64%2.74%1.71%1.75%2.29%1.98%1.65%2.36%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYU.L and UB32.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB32.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB32.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYU.L.

SHYU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while UB32.L is Emerging Markets Equities. SHYU.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped Index, while UB32.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHYU.L and 0.23% for UB32.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYU.L and UB32.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer