PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYU.L achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than HYGB.L's 3.73% return.


SHYU.L

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.04%
6M
0.88%
YTD
1.78%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
4.52%

HYGB.L

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.41%
6M
2.50%
YTD
3.73%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
1.78%1.93%8.55%4.73%2.04%4.96%1.60%9.12%9.42%
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.73%1.56%13.72%1.66%-2.52%0.59%1.90%10.99%-23.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYU.L and HYGB.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018

0.69

The correlation between SHYU.L and HYGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYU.L
SHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGB.L
HYGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYU.LHYGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.33

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

5.93

-1.13

SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYU.L and HYGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.05%, which is greater than HYGB.L's maximum drawdown of -26.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYU.L and HYGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYU.LHYGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.05%

-26.72%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.56%

-3.31%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.06%

-8.96%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.47%

-23.02%

+12.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.93%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-14.28%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.30%

-0.11%

Volatility

SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) is 1.16%, while VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that SHYU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYU.LHYGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

1.48%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

4.96%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.75%

6.52%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.82%

18.18%

-10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.25%

17.40%

-8.15%

SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYU.L vs. HYGB.L - Dividend Comparison

SHYU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, while HYGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
6.27%6.25%6.32%5.76%4.82%4.27%5.16%5.58%5.52%5.74%5.16%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYU.L and HYGB.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYU.L.

SHYU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYGB.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. SHYU.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped Index, while HYGB.L tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHYU.L and 0.40% for HYGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYU.L and HYGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer