PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYU.L vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYU.L vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHYU.L is traded in GBP, while HYG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYG values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYU.L achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than HYG's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SHYU.L has underperformed HYG with an annualized return of 4.84%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively higher 5.69% annualized return.


SHYU.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-1.85%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
2.26%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.84%

HYG

1D
0.19%
1M
1.32%
YTD
1.92%
6M
1.14%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
5.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYU.L vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-1.70%-4.17%8.56%4.72%2.04%4.96%1.60%9.12%4.39%-3.89%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.92%0.86%9.85%5.96%-0.40%4.74%1.40%9.75%3.79%-3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYU.L and HYG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2011

0.71

The correlation between SHYU.L and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYU.L vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYU.L
SHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYU.L vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYU.LHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.23

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

1.95

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

6.03

-5.60

SHYU.L vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYU.L and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYU.LHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

1.25

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.58

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.55

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.60

0.00

Drawdowns

SHYU.L vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYU.L drawdown since its inception was -15.01%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -23.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYU.L and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYU.LHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.01%

-23.86%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.61%

-3.88%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-10.25%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.08%

-10.25%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.01%

-14.89%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.14%

-1.05%

-8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-3.77%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

1.25%

+2.58%

Volatility

SHYU.L vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.29%. This indicates that SHYU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYU.LHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

1.29%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

4.44%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

6.04%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

8.55%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.74%

10.41%

-0.67%

SHYU.L vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYU.L vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

SHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%6.32%5.76%4.82%4.27%5.16%5.58%5.52%5.74%5.16%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYU.L and HYG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYU.L.

SHYU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. SHYU.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped Index, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHYU.L and 0.49% for HYG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYU.L and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer