PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYL vs. HYDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYL vs. HYDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYL achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly higher than HYDW's 0.77% return.


SHYL

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.43%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*

HYDW

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.20%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYL vs. HYDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
1.05%7.78%8.52%11.39%-5.21%4.60%3.64%10.16%-0.84%
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
0.77%8.47%5.42%9.84%-7.86%2.77%5.51%11.44%-1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYL and HYDW is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.86

The correlation between SHYL and HYDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYL vs. HYDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYL
SHYL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

HYDW
HYDW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYL vs. HYDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYLHYDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

2.58

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.88

12.28

+2.61

SHYL vs. HYDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYL Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the HYDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYL and HYDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYLHYDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.82

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.55

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Drawdowns

SHYL vs. HYDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYL drawdown since its inception was -19.26%, which is greater than HYDW's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYL and HYDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYLHYDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-17.75%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-2.09%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.73%

-3.64%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.60%

-12.68%

+3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.37%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-1.89%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.44%

-0.04%

Volatility

SHYL vs. HYDW - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) at 0.74%. This indicates that SHYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYLHYDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.74%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

2.28%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

2.96%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

6.40%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.69%

6.99%

-0.30%

SHYL vs. HYDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SHYL and HYDW have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SHYL vs. HYDW - Dividend Comparison

SHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than HYDW's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
5.76%5.75%5.35%5.69%4.78%3.30%4.45%4.56%4.42%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
6.94%7.02%7.26%6.60%5.52%4.65%6.16%5.93%5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYL and HYDW have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHYL has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to HYDW (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYL dropped -19.26% vs HYDW's -17.75%.

On 5-year performance, SHYL leads with 4.85% vs 3.52% for HYDW. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, HYDW has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SHYL has performed better with a 4.85% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHYL and HYDW have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 5.76% for HYDW.

SHYL tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market 0-5 Year Index, while HYDW tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index.

SHYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYL and HYDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer